It is 'way past time the gene "therapy" designation is buried once and for all! "Therapy" means "therapeutic". There is NOTHING therapeutic about poison bioweapon gene-transfer drugs!!!!
May 12, 2023·edited May 12, 2023Liked by Jenna McCarthy
Too many are hypnotized by the PROGRAMMING of the mind on TelLIEVision.
Propaganda and indoctrination within the TV “programmes” .
They’ve now included social media to their arsenal of weapons.
Intentional strategic Destruction of cultural values is underway within USA and in lockstep in ALL countries worldwide - MAJOR attack on family, faith, country , and morality (dismantling of protective Nation States)
All in lock-step tells you deep state and “darkness” is involved.
Jenna - my parents had me and my sister soon after World War II. She told me the same story about not breastfeeding because it reflected a poor socioeconomic status. They easily afforded the price for the formula although they weren't "rich" by any means. Yes, that's an excellent example of propaganda and how it has negatively impacted our children's health. Where was the NIH or the FDA, who should have been countering that false narrative and insuring young mothers that breast milk was best for her baby? That was another industry that captured our public health agencies and prevented them from doing what was in the public's best interest.
I think many of us “boomers” born at the conclusion of WW2, were not breastfed d/t the reasons cited above. It’s very sad to me b/c breastfeeding one’s baby sets them on track to a healthier immune system beginning w/the colostrum that a woman’s body produces when her milk first comes in.
My mama, born in 1911 in Chile, was breastfed but when me & brother came in ‘45 & ‘50 we were formula fed. She did, however, support me fully when I breastfed my 2nd son. God bless her! Women can encourage their daughters to carry on a tradition of breastfeeding whether they breastfed or formula fed. It’s just a very natural way & one doesn’t need to rely on big corporations, especially in these times.
As a mother who was convinced, by my mother, that the bottle was superior, i would like to address your comments about how we could be convinced. Please keep in mind a few things about previous generations: we didnt have the internet back then, we didnt have 24 hour news either. We were raised to believe that there was truth in advertising and laws that we all followed, so if it was on TV it had to be true. We had never heard of soy or any of those other ingredients, except sugar, and people didn't particularly read labels like we do now. Maybe that goes back to the honesty thing. I guess we were naive, but our lives were a heck of a lot less complicated then and the country was more together, pulling in the same direction. I miss those days. When my second child came, 16 years after the 1st child, i did what my doctor said was best and breastfed and also the third child. It was a wonderful bonding experience and i highly recommend it. God had the best plan.
Thank you for the thoughtful comment, and I did not mean to imply anyone who bottle fed "should have known better." I vaccinated my kids up until Covid. I believed the FDA over the years when they told us that eggs were bad and that "whole wheat bread" was good. Don't even get me started on sunscreen! It's laughable now, but we have been conditioned to believe "them" no matter how absurd their recommendations are. I'm glad you had such a doctor for your second, and happy to have you here. :)
I road the wave of breastfeeding into the mid 80s & was determined to breastfeed my newborn when he was launched in 1986. It was a godsend for us b/c he developed urinary reflux & a very serious infection @ 8weeks. Suckling him was the only thing that gave him ease. I joined La Leche League when he was born & they thankfully showed me how to hold him & help him latch on. It was all wonderful. His ureter reflux resolved w/growth but my breastfeeding saw him into his toddler years & he was a tremendously happy child. Best years of my life!
May 12, 2023·edited May 12, 2023Liked by Jenna McCarthy
Thanks for highlighting yet another massive coercive Big Pharma con in trying to undermine the natural act of breast-feeding.
Ask yourselves Why do Big Pharma claim immunity from liability from injuries & DEATHS caused by their "SAFE and Effective" (my arrse) medicines & experimental death shots?
I did and reinforced my suspicions when my GP refused to respond to my requests for proof the 'EXPERIMENTAL' injections were PROVEN SAFE! So much for his Hippocratic oath to "DO NO HARM".
My arse indeed!My husbands VA doctor was more interested in jabbing my husband than he was in his physical exam. It was very obvious he was given an agenda to jab every patient by his aggressive laser focus on that singular thing. We politely declined and in doing so we may have hurt his jab quota bonus .Sorry not sorry!
Thanks Bug Goo! They're all on financial 'incentives' or/and kick-backs. FDA, CDC, the Press, media, Big Pharma down to Doctors, hospitals, etc, etc,. "Jab 'em all" - That's their motto!
What's the worse that could happen? Vax injuries or DEATHS with absolutely NO LIABILITY for a legal Claim! The system stinks and it beats me how the public can be so naiive to believe 'they' have our best interests at heart! Keep your powder dry 'cos they're coming from us UNJABBED that have the ability to join the dots! Bring it on - I say! Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer.
Your mentioning of the effectiveness of the pharmedia( a good descriptive word )that gets over 50% of the country parroting the bullet points of the advertisers hit home . Once you see it you can’t unsee it.The breastfeeding shaming of women to push baby formula profit margins reminded me of other advertising shenanigans that harmed the buyers and enriched the companies.Thankyou again..
This falls squarely on the shoulders of the pediatricians and family practice docs who were hypnotized with the Pharma BS as usual.
The parents do not stand a chance because most are not educated enough to know the benefits of breast feeding and no one reviews it or goes over it with them. The breast are regarded as décor to be enhanced and embellished and adorned etc. Everyone forgets what their other "REAL JOB IS " to feed the baby!!! or babies!!!
The docs do not speak up or worse yet do not know to speak up.
Some Pharma rep walks in wearing a suit and bringing donuts or better still some cute honey pie with an "industry white paper" showing great results and ease of use and the docs do not demand the peer reviewed literature or worse yet start recommending the powdered milk.
Breastfed (chestfed) babies have a lower risk of:
Diarrhea, vomiting and preterm necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
Respiratory infections like pneumonia, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)and whooping cough.
Ear infections.
Bacterial meningitis.
Asthma.
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and infant mortality.
Childhood obesity.
Eczema.
Type 2 diabetes.
Leukemia (in childhood).
Cavities and orthodontic problems.
Celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
LOWER INCIDENCE OF AUTISM
This is statistically TRUE of all of the benefits
For the mother
lowers your risk for several diseases and conditions, like:
Breast cancer.
Ovarian cancer.
Endometrial cancer.
Thyroid cancer.
Osteoporosis.
Type 2 diabetes.
Cardiovascular disease including high blood pressure and high cholesterol.
Postpartum depression.
Promoting faster weight loss after birth (in some people).
You can breastfeed anywhere without worrying about preparing bottles or mixing formula. Your milk is always available without needing to bring other supplies.
Breastfeeding parents learn to read their infant’s cues, and babies learn to trust caregivers. This helps shape your baby’s early behavior.
It’s inexpensive. The cost of formula can be up to $10 a day depending on the brand, type and amount your baby drinks.
These are simple benefits that enhance the mother child relationship the baby's health and the mother's sense of well being.
The infant formula business is just like the pharma business - they will say anything at anytime to make a dollar .
I agree 1,000% But I also think many if not most of those docs are absent of malice; they're simply regurgitating what they've been told by corrupt, captured medical societies and academic institutions. The entire system needs to be demolished and rebuilt with integrity.
No such thing as chest feeding. Men are not designed to feed babies. Claiming otherwise is as absurd as claiming the Safe and Effectives are safe and effective.
Well who said anything about men here? Try reading the comment genuis.
"The breast are regarded as décor to be enhanced and embellished and adorned etc. Everyone forgets what their other "REAL JOB IS " to feed the baby!!! or babies!!!" Breastfed (chestfed) babies have a lower risk of:
You have to realize that everyone is not as educated as you THINK you are. The breast are part of the chest as a matter of fact they sit anterior to it. Men do not lactate women do.
Lactation is the process of making human milk. Human milk is secreted through your mammary glands, which are located in your breasts. Lactation is hormonally driven and occurs naturally in people who are pregnant. It can also be induced in those who are not pregnant. Men cannot lactate unless they take hormones etc.
I presume you are referring to the transgender crowd which I do not support because it is spawned by perversion etc. The idea that a baby would get the same benefit from a transgender or other male that has been augmented with hormones is absurd.
I will not further entertain this comment because it is BS
I never ever heard the term “chest feeding” until the transgender folks began using it to refer to men “breastfeeding” babies. Courtesy of hormones etc, as you correctly point out.
I’ve been in breastfeeding circles for several decades, so I have assumed that “chest feeding” refers to transgender people attempting to do what they were not designed to do, since that’s the only context in which I have heard the word used.
I should have been MORE clear that I was referring to genetic chromosomal XX females and not the new subspecies of XY instant sex change females created by our democratic party.
Next they will allege that it is the natural progression of evolution and teach it in schools at the first grade level.
Very well-argued points. Sadly, the tendency to fall for one coercion campaign is predictive of succumbing to the next one. Yesterday breastfeeding, today vaccinations and tomorrow.....? Many like me are preparing for the next battle which is yet undetermined. How do we say “I told you so” when the delusions leading to blind compliance still remain?
My mother-in-law (born in 1945) still sees breastfeeding as “bovine.” I imagine my mom did too. She was born in the same year and did not breastfeed me or my brothers. I often wonder if my weight issues are at least in part linked back to this unfortunate succumbing to advertising...
Between formula and vaccines and the processed food "revolution," it's a wonder ANY of us are healthy!!! If you look at photos really up until the 1970s, you're hard pressed to find a single overweight person. Now it's a struggle to find one who's thin. We're playing with a stacked deck for sure. :(
Love this post Jenna! We are kindred spirits....It was so good to meet you! I’m looking forward to reading more of your articles and books and Pierre’s book. Take care!
Tricia! So happy to see your name here and thanks for taking time to comment (and respond to my 1,843 text questions LOL)! Let me know what you think of the book. :)
Equally absurd is the notion that artificial fat (Crisco, “corn” oil, “vegetable” oil, artificial butter which we call margarine) is superior to natural fat like real butter, lard, avocado oil, and bacon fat.
Or that food-like substances such as whole-grain Goldfish crackers and Fig Newtons and Captain Crunch breakfast cereal are actual food. They are at best treats to be indulged in rarely. Nobody needs to eat them as food. Or snacks.
Snacks… why do we think there is a special category of food called snacks? Eat real regular food when you are hungry. “Snacks” not required.
Yes 💯!!! Another perspective though: I tried breastfeeding for nine months with no luck, pumping and using a hose to persuade my son the nurse when I only had a tablespoon of milk, I was devastated I could not nurse and worries for his health. Now I have come to realize my secondary infertility problems are from high mercury in my body messing with my thyroid and adrenals (discovered recently through hair tissue mineral analysis, my nutritional balance is off bc of of the metal biochemistry affect in my body! So now I realize my son could have been poisoned by my breastmilk if I was able to breastfeed. We are being poisoned left and right by corporate control of our government! Now with infertility through the roof, we need to figure out how to stop poisoning people with “safe and effective” pharmaceuticals!
Excellent point of OUR BODIES' INFINITE WISDOM. Yours wouldn't produce toxic breastmilk! Yours is a perfect example of the need for alternatives--it's the pushing of those alternatives on everyone (and in particular, the crappy, chemical-laden ones) that infuriates me! Agree that we need to understand that our government will put poison in and on every last thing we consume, sadly, and that the more we can become self-sufficient or at last support local farmers and growers we know, the safer we'll be.
It is 'way past time the gene "therapy" designation is buried once and for all! "Therapy" means "therapeutic". There is NOTHING therapeutic about poison bioweapon gene-transfer drugs!!!!
Excellent point and noted!
A renowned psychiatrist once said, 80% of the population does not have the ability to defy an illegal or immoral order from authority”
yep...asch and milgram experiments prove his point
most follow the herd and teLIEvision is the cowboy in this age
Too many are hypnotized by the PROGRAMMING of the mind on TelLIEVision.
Propaganda and indoctrination within the TV “programmes” .
They’ve now included social media to their arsenal of weapons.
Intentional strategic Destruction of cultural values is underway within USA and in lockstep in ALL countries worldwide - MAJOR attack on family, faith, country , and morality (dismantling of protective Nation States)
All in lock-step tells you deep state and “darkness” is involved.
This is a war against humanity.
Jenna - my parents had me and my sister soon after World War II. She told me the same story about not breastfeeding because it reflected a poor socioeconomic status. They easily afforded the price for the formula although they weren't "rich" by any means. Yes, that's an excellent example of propaganda and how it has negatively impacted our children's health. Where was the NIH or the FDA, who should have been countering that false narrative and insuring young mothers that breast milk was best for her baby? That was another industry that captured our public health agencies and prevented them from doing what was in the public's best interest.
Can you imagine the stories our kids and grandkids will be telling one day about this whole debacle???? Thanks for your comment. :)
I was born in late '40s. My mother did the same. If she would have known the truth she would have breast fed her children.
I think many of us “boomers” born at the conclusion of WW2, were not breastfed d/t the reasons cited above. It’s very sad to me b/c breastfeeding one’s baby sets them on track to a healthier immune system beginning w/the colostrum that a woman’s body produces when her milk first comes in.
My mama, born in 1911 in Chile, was breastfed but when me & brother came in ‘45 & ‘50 we were formula fed. She did, however, support me fully when I breastfed my 2nd son. God bless her! Women can encourage their daughters to carry on a tradition of breastfeeding whether they breastfed or formula fed. It’s just a very natural way & one doesn’t need to rely on big corporations, especially in these times.
As a mother who was convinced, by my mother, that the bottle was superior, i would like to address your comments about how we could be convinced. Please keep in mind a few things about previous generations: we didnt have the internet back then, we didnt have 24 hour news either. We were raised to believe that there was truth in advertising and laws that we all followed, so if it was on TV it had to be true. We had never heard of soy or any of those other ingredients, except sugar, and people didn't particularly read labels like we do now. Maybe that goes back to the honesty thing. I guess we were naive, but our lives were a heck of a lot less complicated then and the country was more together, pulling in the same direction. I miss those days. When my second child came, 16 years after the 1st child, i did what my doctor said was best and breastfed and also the third child. It was a wonderful bonding experience and i highly recommend it. God had the best plan.
Thank you for the thoughtful comment, and I did not mean to imply anyone who bottle fed "should have known better." I vaccinated my kids up until Covid. I believed the FDA over the years when they told us that eggs were bad and that "whole wheat bread" was good. Don't even get me started on sunscreen! It's laughable now, but we have been conditioned to believe "them" no matter how absurd their recommendations are. I'm glad you had such a doctor for your second, and happy to have you here. :)
Not offended, it was what it was. But now, with all the info available i dont trust anyone any more. No vax for most of our family either.
I road the wave of breastfeeding into the mid 80s & was determined to breastfeed my newborn when he was launched in 1986. It was a godsend for us b/c he developed urinary reflux & a very serious infection @ 8weeks. Suckling him was the only thing that gave him ease. I joined La Leche League when he was born & they thankfully showed me how to hold him & help him latch on. It was all wonderful. His ureter reflux resolved w/growth but my breastfeeding saw him into his toddler years & he was a tremendously happy child. Best years of my life!
Thanks for highlighting yet another massive coercive Big Pharma con in trying to undermine the natural act of breast-feeding.
Ask yourselves Why do Big Pharma claim immunity from liability from injuries & DEATHS caused by their "SAFE and Effective" (my arrse) medicines & experimental death shots?
I did and reinforced my suspicions when my GP refused to respond to my requests for proof the 'EXPERIMENTAL' injections were PROVEN SAFE! So much for his Hippocratic oath to "DO NO HARM".
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer.
My arse indeed!My husbands VA doctor was more interested in jabbing my husband than he was in his physical exam. It was very obvious he was given an agenda to jab every patient by his aggressive laser focus on that singular thing. We politely declined and in doing so we may have hurt his jab quota bonus .Sorry not sorry!
Thanks Bug Goo! They're all on financial 'incentives' or/and kick-backs. FDA, CDC, the Press, media, Big Pharma down to Doctors, hospitals, etc, etc,. "Jab 'em all" - That's their motto!
What's the worse that could happen? Vax injuries or DEATHS with absolutely NO LIABILITY for a legal Claim! The system stinks and it beats me how the public can be so naiive to believe 'they' have our best interests at heart! Keep your powder dry 'cos they're coming from us UNJABBED that have the ability to join the dots! Bring it on - I say! Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer.
Nothing better than mother’s milk!
Your mentioning of the effectiveness of the pharmedia( a good descriptive word )that gets over 50% of the country parroting the bullet points of the advertisers hit home . Once you see it you can’t unsee it.The breastfeeding shaming of women to push baby formula profit margins reminded me of other advertising shenanigans that harmed the buyers and enriched the companies.Thankyou again..
When one understands that their GOAL aka Georgia-Guidestones
Is to have a small human compliant animal zoo, where say 500M humans are kept around as sex slaves and domestic labor;
That the surviving humans are so docile and weak that they love their captivity
That in all cases the tradition man&woman are to be destroyed.
...
Ergo when somebody tells me I cannot use this or that word, or that I must suck up to homo's I say "FUCK YOU"
This falls squarely on the shoulders of the pediatricians and family practice docs who were hypnotized with the Pharma BS as usual.
The parents do not stand a chance because most are not educated enough to know the benefits of breast feeding and no one reviews it or goes over it with them. The breast are regarded as décor to be enhanced and embellished and adorned etc. Everyone forgets what their other "REAL JOB IS " to feed the baby!!! or babies!!!
The docs do not speak up or worse yet do not know to speak up.
Some Pharma rep walks in wearing a suit and bringing donuts or better still some cute honey pie with an "industry white paper" showing great results and ease of use and the docs do not demand the peer reviewed literature or worse yet start recommending the powdered milk.
Breastfed (chestfed) babies have a lower risk of:
Diarrhea, vomiting and preterm necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
Respiratory infections like pneumonia, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)and whooping cough.
Ear infections.
Bacterial meningitis.
Asthma.
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and infant mortality.
Childhood obesity.
Eczema.
Type 2 diabetes.
Leukemia (in childhood).
Cavities and orthodontic problems.
Celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
LOWER INCIDENCE OF AUTISM
This is statistically TRUE of all of the benefits
For the mother
lowers your risk for several diseases and conditions, like:
Breast cancer.
Ovarian cancer.
Endometrial cancer.
Thyroid cancer.
Osteoporosis.
Type 2 diabetes.
Cardiovascular disease including high blood pressure and high cholesterol.
Postpartum depression.
Promoting faster weight loss after birth (in some people).
You can breastfeed anywhere without worrying about preparing bottles or mixing formula. Your milk is always available without needing to bring other supplies.
Breastfeeding parents learn to read their infant’s cues, and babies learn to trust caregivers. This helps shape your baby’s early behavior.
It’s inexpensive. The cost of formula can be up to $10 a day depending on the brand, type and amount your baby drinks.
These are simple benefits that enhance the mother child relationship the baby's health and the mother's sense of well being.
The infant formula business is just like the pharma business - they will say anything at anytime to make a dollar .
I agree 1,000% But I also think many if not most of those docs are absent of malice; they're simply regurgitating what they've been told by corrupt, captured medical societies and academic institutions. The entire system needs to be demolished and rebuilt with integrity.
Malice is inferred by their negligence
No such thing as chest feeding. Men are not designed to feed babies. Claiming otherwise is as absurd as claiming the Safe and Effectives are safe and effective.
Well who said anything about men here? Try reading the comment genuis.
"The breast are regarded as décor to be enhanced and embellished and adorned etc. Everyone forgets what their other "REAL JOB IS " to feed the baby!!! or babies!!!" Breastfed (chestfed) babies have a lower risk of:
You have to realize that everyone is not as educated as you THINK you are. The breast are part of the chest as a matter of fact they sit anterior to it. Men do not lactate women do.
Lactation is the process of making human milk. Human milk is secreted through your mammary glands, which are located in your breasts. Lactation is hormonally driven and occurs naturally in people who are pregnant. It can also be induced in those who are not pregnant. Men cannot lactate unless they take hormones etc.
I presume you are referring to the transgender crowd which I do not support because it is spawned by perversion etc. The idea that a baby would get the same benefit from a transgender or other male that has been augmented with hormones is absurd.
I will not further entertain this comment because it is BS
Yes, I was referring to the transgender crowd.
I never ever heard the term “chest feeding” until the transgender folks began using it to refer to men “breastfeeding” babies. Courtesy of hormones etc, as you correctly point out.
I’ve been in breastfeeding circles for several decades, so I have assumed that “chest feeding” refers to transgender people attempting to do what they were not designed to do, since that’s the only context in which I have heard the word used.
Ok I get it. Honest mistake and no harm no foul.
I should have been MORE clear that I was referring to genetic chromosomal XX females and not the new subspecies of XY instant sex change females created by our democratic party.
Next they will allege that it is the natural progression of evolution and teach it in schools at the first grade level.
Very well-argued points. Sadly, the tendency to fall for one coercion campaign is predictive of succumbing to the next one. Yesterday breastfeeding, today vaccinations and tomorrow.....? Many like me are preparing for the next battle which is yet undetermined. How do we say “I told you so” when the delusions leading to blind compliance still remain?
My mother-in-law (born in 1945) still sees breastfeeding as “bovine.” I imagine my mom did too. She was born in the same year and did not breastfeed me or my brothers. I often wonder if my weight issues are at least in part linked back to this unfortunate succumbing to advertising...
Between formula and vaccines and the processed food "revolution," it's a wonder ANY of us are healthy!!! If you look at photos really up until the 1970s, you're hard pressed to find a single overweight person. Now it's a struggle to find one who's thin. We're playing with a stacked deck for sure. :(
Love this post Jenna! We are kindred spirits....It was so good to meet you! I’m looking forward to reading more of your articles and books and Pierre’s book. Take care!
Tricia! So happy to see your name here and thanks for taking time to comment (and respond to my 1,843 text questions LOL)! Let me know what you think of the book. :)
Equally absurd is the notion that artificial fat (Crisco, “corn” oil, “vegetable” oil, artificial butter which we call margarine) is superior to natural fat like real butter, lard, avocado oil, and bacon fat.
Or that food-like substances such as whole-grain Goldfish crackers and Fig Newtons and Captain Crunch breakfast cereal are actual food. They are at best treats to be indulged in rarely. Nobody needs to eat them as food. Or snacks.
Snacks… why do we think there is a special category of food called snacks? Eat real regular food when you are hungry. “Snacks” not required.
Yes 💯!!! Another perspective though: I tried breastfeeding for nine months with no luck, pumping and using a hose to persuade my son the nurse when I only had a tablespoon of milk, I was devastated I could not nurse and worries for his health. Now I have come to realize my secondary infertility problems are from high mercury in my body messing with my thyroid and adrenals (discovered recently through hair tissue mineral analysis, my nutritional balance is off bc of of the metal biochemistry affect in my body! So now I realize my son could have been poisoned by my breastmilk if I was able to breastfeed. We are being poisoned left and right by corporate control of our government! Now with infertility through the roof, we need to figure out how to stop poisoning people with “safe and effective” pharmaceuticals!
Excellent point of OUR BODIES' INFINITE WISDOM. Yours wouldn't produce toxic breastmilk! Yours is a perfect example of the need for alternatives--it's the pushing of those alternatives on everyone (and in particular, the crappy, chemical-laden ones) that infuriates me! Agree that we need to understand that our government will put poison in and on every last thing we consume, sadly, and that the more we can become self-sufficient or at last support local farmers and growers we know, the safer we'll be.
I like you so much!! I really do. Thank you for your courage.