They lost but they won. They got to harvest the maximum amount of money, reward the maximum number of their pharma captors, harm/kill the maximum amount of lab rats and defrock the maximum amount of health care providers guilty of thought crimes. Other than that "we won".
It's like when you steal an election and later are found out. "Oops my bad". But the election result still stands.
There is no justice without PUNITIVE AND SUBSTANTIVE consequences and correction. By that metric there is no justice this time either. "Oops my bad", better than nothing, but does not hack it. The ruling just shows who's in charge. In fact pretty sure we don't even get an "oops my bad" apology. Just removal of some postings and a lesson on sovereign immunity.
IE "we can do what we want without consequence ... just so you know"
Always good that the pharma captured masters remind us.
As Catherine Austin Fitts is famous for saying, "crime that pays is crime that stays". Appears this crime paid very well and so next time they need to harvest some dollars and kill a bunch of us for their masters there is no incentive not to do it. Because we are in the Sovereign Immunity consequence free zone.
No different than stealing elections. NEVER a consequence and ALWAYS a huge reward to the perps and the compliant
It is clear that The EUGENICS community is EXTREMELY well funded and that their goals are being met Incrementally. These SICK BASTARDS must be flushed out into the DAYLIGHT, dragged into the International Criminal Court and Sumarilly CONVICTED of crystal clear Crimes Against Humanity. #MEGA
I was refused ivermectin and finally used the horsepaste, successfully. More recently, when my husband had a visit with a new care provider, he was offered more covid-19 jabs, pneumococcal vaccine, tetanus vaccine and 1 other I can not remember. I told the NP that he won’t be taking any covid-19 BIOWEAPONS or any other injections!
I don't see it as a win until those at the FDA who pushed the ridiculous lies are sent to prison for decades. Their lies resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands at a minimum.
Ivermectin was banned in UK nhs and unpurchasable unless you knew people in countries where it could be bought. Google just told you it would kill you, it was for horses and this was peddled by the BiasedBritishCorporation when they did deign to mention it. THANK YOU brave medics and scientists for persevering. We must now perservere to spread the victory and un blind the blinkered.
This "wonderful" decision just hid the issue so it can be repeated. I see nothing at all in the court decision that will prevent the FDA's fro0m badmouthi8ng some other cure. The phrase "Retaining a right to publish a correction" is hardly a command. Thus, this saga will be repeated, and the results will be similar (aka insanity) after much litigation making some lawyers wealthier, making the taxpayers poorer, and way too late to prevent injury and death for as yet untold numbers of people. By merely making Ivermectin disappear from the COVID section of the FDA, without further comment there is nothing to stop the media from continuing to call it by any negative terminology it chooses. Chances are if Ivermectin were a human being, the court would have demanded that a retraction be posted, an appropriate apology, suitable punishment for those in charge of the negation campaign and compensation. This decision will not stop governments or media from doing the same thing to force people to spend more money than necessary and fill their pockets.
While I'm very happy about the case, the last sentence of the settlement leaves much to be desired:
"Neither this Stipulation of Dismissal nor the actions described herein shall constitute an admission or evidence of any issue of fact or law, wrongdoing, misconduct, or liability on the part of any party to this litigation."
What's to stop the FDA from hanging out to dry the doctors who prescribed ivermectin for viruses like Covid in the past or in the future? FDA could just point to that last sentence of the settlement and say, "hey, we deleted the tweet, but never said that we'd not take action against you for prescribing ivermectin."
I am writing this wherever I can. CHD permanently banned me for asking the question " Why is RFK jr. shouting from the rooftops that the unborn babies of mothers who are pushed to get vaccines while pregnant are damaged and in some cases die before birth or soon afterward, but staunchly supports that same mothers right to pay an abortionist to dismember that child, burn it alive and/or decapitate it and that without anesthesia - at the very least. He is a hypocrite and a coward. Actually - much worse considering what he stands for. This one act of censorship alone shows this is all theatre.
Has the FLCCC already been labeled "controlled opposition"? There are certain substack authors out there who see anyone and everyone who exposes the mainstream medical madness as "controlled opposition"! It's a bit like the organized conspiracies, as Dr Vernon Coleman has pointed out, surrounding Kate's disappearance and the social media conjectures: "She's been sacrificed in a satanic ritual"; "she was abducted by reptilian aliens" blah blah blah. All designed to posit that independent journalists and independent social media are hotbeds of mental illness. This is clearly by design as its sole purpose is to push for much greater censorship, and the easiest way to do that is for TPTB to claim that totally bonkers lunatics are spreading the wildest conspiracy theories devoid of any factual basis.
They should be made to PAY for these deaths. If they are taking down the information from social media that lead people to avoid life saving treatment, it is essentially admitting responsibility.
The following copy and paste (in mealy mouthed weasel words) declares that ...
"The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration has ended a ban on off-label prescriptions of anti-parasitic drug ivermectin, nearly two years after floods of people attempted to procure the drug in the mistaken belief it would treat Covid-19.
The TGA announced it would remove the ban for off-label prescriptions of the drug from 1 June. Off-label prescriptions had been limited to specialists such as dermatologists, gastroenterologists and infectious disease specialists since September 2021.
The decision was made due to what the TGA said was “sufficient evidence that the safety risks to individuals and public health is low” in the “current health climate”. The high rates of vaccination against Covid-19 in Australia and high hybrid immunity meant that use of the drug by people was “unlikely to now compromise public health” including the risk of potential shortages of the drug for its stated use for treating river blindness, threadworm of the intestines, and scabies. But the regulator stressed the lifting of the ban did not amount to an endorsement of off-label prescribing of ivermectin to treat Covid-19, citing studies showing it was not an effective treatment.
A large number of clinical studies have demonstrated ivermectin does not improve outcomes in patients with Covid-19. The National Covid Evidence Taskforce (NCET) and many similar bodies around the world, including the World Health Organization, strongly advises against the use of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of Covid-19.”
My comment: The last sentence demonstrates that the TGA is completely ignorant of peer reviewed journal articles quoted by Dr Marik and more-over the TGA refuses to admit that its Covid-19 management advisories were WRONG!
Hopefully the first of many defeats for CDC, FDA, EPA moving forward.
They lost but they won. They got to harvest the maximum amount of money, reward the maximum number of their pharma captors, harm/kill the maximum amount of lab rats and defrock the maximum amount of health care providers guilty of thought crimes. Other than that "we won".
It's like when you steal an election and later are found out. "Oops my bad". But the election result still stands.
There is no justice without PUNITIVE AND SUBSTANTIVE consequences and correction. By that metric there is no justice this time either. "Oops my bad", better than nothing, but does not hack it. The ruling just shows who's in charge. In fact pretty sure we don't even get an "oops my bad" apology. Just removal of some postings and a lesson on sovereign immunity.
IE "we can do what we want without consequence ... just so you know"
Always good that the pharma captured masters remind us.
As Catherine Austin Fitts is famous for saying, "crime that pays is crime that stays". Appears this crime paid very well and so next time they need to harvest some dollars and kill a bunch of us for their masters there is no incentive not to do it. Because we are in the Sovereign Immunity consequence free zone.
No different than stealing elections. NEVER a consequence and ALWAYS a huge reward to the perps and the compliant
It is clear that The EUGENICS community is EXTREMELY well funded and that their goals are being met Incrementally. These SICK BASTARDS must be flushed out into the DAYLIGHT, dragged into the International Criminal Court and Sumarilly CONVICTED of crystal clear Crimes Against Humanity. #MEGA
They got off too easy. They need to pay all the families that were impacted by their lies.
Love FLCCC! Thank you for the depth of your fight!
I was refused ivermectin and finally used the horsepaste, successfully. More recently, when my husband had a visit with a new care provider, he was offered more covid-19 jabs, pneumococcal vaccine, tetanus vaccine and 1 other I can not remember. I told the NP that he won’t be taking any covid-19 BIOWEAPONS or any other injections!
The settlement is a small, very small, victory.
My definition of victory includes change.
Nothing has changed.
The beast will do as it wishes.
This is not even a battle victory, much less a war victory.
The beast has no arms, no legs, no head.
The beast is directed by people.
People have arms, legs, and heads.
Until people suffer they will continue to direct the beast for their malicious intentions.
The past head of Herzt is looking for job with non profit organizations.
Who, what bureaucrat has suffered from their ivermectin decisions?
I don't see it as a win until those at the FDA who pushed the ridiculous lies are sent to prison for decades. Their lies resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands at a minimum.
Ivermectin was banned in UK nhs and unpurchasable unless you knew people in countries where it could be bought. Google just told you it would kill you, it was for horses and this was peddled by the BiasedBritishCorporation when they did deign to mention it. THANK YOU brave medics and scientists for persevering. We must now perservere to spread the victory and un blind the blinkered.
This "wonderful" decision just hid the issue so it can be repeated. I see nothing at all in the court decision that will prevent the FDA's fro0m badmouthi8ng some other cure. The phrase "Retaining a right to publish a correction" is hardly a command. Thus, this saga will be repeated, and the results will be similar (aka insanity) after much litigation making some lawyers wealthier, making the taxpayers poorer, and way too late to prevent injury and death for as yet untold numbers of people. By merely making Ivermectin disappear from the COVID section of the FDA, without further comment there is nothing to stop the media from continuing to call it by any negative terminology it chooses. Chances are if Ivermectin were a human being, the court would have demanded that a retraction be posted, an appropriate apology, suitable punishment for those in charge of the negation campaign and compensation. This decision will not stop governments or media from doing the same thing to force people to spend more money than necessary and fill their pockets.
While I'm very happy about the case, the last sentence of the settlement leaves much to be desired:
"Neither this Stipulation of Dismissal nor the actions described herein shall constitute an admission or evidence of any issue of fact or law, wrongdoing, misconduct, or liability on the part of any party to this litigation."
What's to stop the FDA from hanging out to dry the doctors who prescribed ivermectin for viruses like Covid in the past or in the future? FDA could just point to that last sentence of the settlement and say, "hey, we deleted the tweet, but never said that we'd not take action against you for prescribing ivermectin."
I am writing this wherever I can. CHD permanently banned me for asking the question " Why is RFK jr. shouting from the rooftops that the unborn babies of mothers who are pushed to get vaccines while pregnant are damaged and in some cases die before birth or soon afterward, but staunchly supports that same mothers right to pay an abortionist to dismember that child, burn it alive and/or decapitate it and that without anesthesia - at the very least. He is a hypocrite and a coward. Actually - much worse considering what he stands for. This one act of censorship alone shows this is all theatre.
Has the FLCCC already been labeled "controlled opposition"? There are certain substack authors out there who see anyone and everyone who exposes the mainstream medical madness as "controlled opposition"! It's a bit like the organized conspiracies, as Dr Vernon Coleman has pointed out, surrounding Kate's disappearance and the social media conjectures: "She's been sacrificed in a satanic ritual"; "she was abducted by reptilian aliens" blah blah blah. All designed to posit that independent journalists and independent social media are hotbeds of mental illness. This is clearly by design as its sole purpose is to push for much greater censorship, and the easiest way to do that is for TPTB to claim that totally bonkers lunatics are spreading the wildest conspiracy theories devoid of any factual basis.
They should be made to PAY for these deaths. If they are taking down the information from social media that lead people to avoid life saving treatment, it is essentially admitting responsibility.
The following copy and paste (in mealy mouthed weasel words) declares that ...
"The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration has ended a ban on off-label prescriptions of anti-parasitic drug ivermectin, nearly two years after floods of people attempted to procure the drug in the mistaken belief it would treat Covid-19.
The TGA announced it would remove the ban for off-label prescriptions of the drug from 1 June. Off-label prescriptions had been limited to specialists such as dermatologists, gastroenterologists and infectious disease specialists since September 2021.
The decision was made due to what the TGA said was “sufficient evidence that the safety risks to individuals and public health is low” in the “current health climate”. The high rates of vaccination against Covid-19 in Australia and high hybrid immunity meant that use of the drug by people was “unlikely to now compromise public health” including the risk of potential shortages of the drug for its stated use for treating river blindness, threadworm of the intestines, and scabies. But the regulator stressed the lifting of the ban did not amount to an endorsement of off-label prescribing of ivermectin to treat Covid-19, citing studies showing it was not an effective treatment.
A large number of clinical studies have demonstrated ivermectin does not improve outcomes in patients with Covid-19. The National Covid Evidence Taskforce (NCET) and many similar bodies around the world, including the World Health Organization, strongly advises against the use of ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of Covid-19.”
My comment: The last sentence demonstrates that the TGA is completely ignorant of peer reviewed journal articles quoted by Dr Marik and more-over the TGA refuses to admit that its Covid-19 management advisories were WRONG!
There’s so much to read so what does this mean ? Thank you doctors ❤️