16 Comments
Nov 2Liked by FLCCC Alliance

If you're going to take (historically) high doses of Vitamin D, shouldn't you also be taking K2?

Expand full comment

Page 73 of the Cancer Care Monograph (https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Cancer-Care-FLCCC-Dr-Paul-Marik-v2.pdf) states:

"...It is best to include both vitamin K2 (menaquinone [MK7] 100 mcg/day, or 800 mcg/week) and magnesium (250-500 mg/day) when doses of vitamin D > 8 000 IU/day are taken. (560, 561) It should be noted that vitamin K2 itself has anticancer properties and an inverse relationship exists between vitamin K2 (and not K1) intake and cancer mortality. (562-565)"

Expand full comment

Great question, and something I also want to know. Some say yes. But I want to know what Dr. Marik and the FLCCC think.

Expand full comment
Nov 2·edited Nov 2Liked by FLCCC Alliance

"Post-COVID cancer is a disease driven by spike protein, whether by injection or infection." I definitely agree with this statement as I am currently experiencing this with an unvaccinated person after she showed symptoms of covid almost 2 months ago - the cancer that was at bay with integrative treatments just exploded within weeks. I think I will watch Dr. Goodyear's presentation.

Expand full comment

A very good point and observation that I was about to raise as a comment. In this Covid era, doctors must get to know first both the infection and vaccination status of the patient consulting them and should not ignore relating them to the patient’s reported conditions. They must have a thorough knowledge of the spike proteins ( both sources) and published work on stripping them out from the body. I feel 90% of the cancer cases in these three years ( fresh or recurrence after a long remission) have to be vaccine spike induced , but it is necessary to have some idea of cancer as a sequel to only infection ( no vaccination).

Expand full comment

Thank you for your dedication to humanity and finding cures for cancer that are both compassionate and effective.

Recently, I read that going braless can help prevent breast cancer. “Tight and constrictive clothing (e.g., ties or pants) can be particularly detrimental to health. This is best demonstrated with bras, a recent cultural invention that cause a significant number of issues. Worse still, their usage has been strongly linked to breast cancer.” A Midwestern Doctor: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-your-clothes-and-their-materials-231. This may be something to ask Dr. Ruddy about. Plus, it’s easy enough to do and saves money.

Expand full comment

Toxic Chemo regime kills and is not the way. A wholistic natural approach should be undertaken and there are so many success stories out there.

Expand full comment

Prevention is better than cure (medicine) is no doubt a timeless adage, but difficult to put it in operation. When do I start the prevention measures and in what anticipation ? We would all benefit from step by step advice from the specialists, instead of motherhood advices. For example. What are the symptoms and the nature of their presentations that might require seeking tests for a possible cancer prognosis ? What repurposed medicines and adjuvants and some diet changes would be required at that stage, so that the symptoms get largely resolved quickly and what follow up confirmatory tests to that effect ? How to get a doctors support for this approach ? Simple FAQs, looking at treating cancer like any other disease, instead of the intimidating processes in use now. I have one or two other thoughts which I will share in time.

Expand full comment

Have you checked the Cancer Care monograph for the information you’re asking about above? Some questions may be answered here. https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Cancer-Care-FLCCC-Dr-Paul-Marik-v2.pdf#page55

Expand full comment

Yes I have read those pages, but even for a well educated with science background like me (PhD in organic chemistry, with nearly 40 years of process industry R&D experience) it is difficult for me to distill out an initial therapeutic regimen of repurposed drugs from those pages, if such a need arises. And for others with lesser backgrounds who have just confronted a cancer prognosis, it will be even more difficult, since most of the time they cannot seek their doctor’s help for this. Regimented food, outdoor exposure, physical activity and exercises are fine, but the only thing people are comfortable in their daily routines are their normal food and prescribed drugs. Of all things in this situation that is most important are drugs for normal patients. So what I am seeking are details provided in such a way that the patients can design their own self prescriptions ( getting them is a big intangible in countries like the USA), say for first three months, next six months after a screening and the like). Alternatively they could be given time limited prescriptions with dosages and guidelines for the first year. You could add drug like adjuvants like vitamins etc. You can see in the comments on your next podcast, people struggling to understand dosages etc on Ivermectin and Fenbendazole. Why don’t you all, well experienced with cancer repurposed drugs, provide a presentation on half a dozen common situations versus advised specific medicinal protocols, which would be immediately helpful to the patients struck by the prognosis thunderbolt ? I am sorry but I hope my points are well understood. That said, the monograph is an excellent compilation on the capabilities of the 18 drugs. Sometime, you must offer practical guidelines on the use of DMSO ( or Sulforaphane) and Anti histamines on repurposed treatments for cancer, the second one could be important in the vaccine induced turbo cancers ?

Expand full comment

mRNA injections (mistakenly called 'vaccines') are unsafe and seem to promote, or even resurrect, cancers - even if pre-existing cancers were deemed 'cured'. mRNA will bring them back for a quick death from the cancers which you were assured were resolved.

It's OK, we've downloaded (and PRINTED) enough incriminating evidence to put them all on trial and, when found guilty of Premeditated Mass-Murder, the perpetrators will be given the death sentence!

Unjabbed Mick (UK) Fighting to make Big Pharma accept LIABILITY for their deadly but highly profitable, depopulating injections they call 'vaccines'.

Expand full comment

We will have a huge voice for transparency in Robert Kennedy Jr after President Trump is back in charge. RFK has impressed me and I have paid no attention to him at all up until now. He is going to MAHA!

Make America Healthy Again.

Expand full comment

Agreed Sumpter53! I've been aware of RFK (jr) since the Covid and Vax farces started back in 2019. He's been out of the limelight until I/we realised he was part of the 'Children's Health Defense, when he started make us all aware of the other, sinister and corrupt side of international health = particularly in the USA, where it's been rife for decades.

With RFK and people like Musk giving Trump advice AND some sort of restraint on his impulsive nature, you'll hopefully find a better USA and then better influences on the rest of the world's civilised nations. Hopefully, the World Economic Forum will be revealed for what it is really trying to do to the rest of the non-'Elite' population.

Regards! Unjabbed Mick (UK).

Expand full comment

Is there a typing error in the summary: https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2nd-Edition-CancerCare-Summary.pdf: on p. 15: should 250-2000 mg melatonin nightly actually be: 0.75-5 mg, or 20-40 mg nightly? Thank you.

Expand full comment

Also, on https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Cancer-Care-Webinar-1-1.pdf#page=20: vitamin D3: should this be: ~100 ng/dL, instead of ~100 mg/dl? Thanks.

Expand full comment