Michael Crichton on scientific consensus:

"I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.

Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period."

Expand full comment

The lack of faith in God , the fact that human, at least some believe they can be the masters of universe is the key problem, they clearly think there is nobody over them anymore , nobody can challenge them , not even the common rules which governed our life until recently, then they feel entitled to decide what’s wrong and what’s good for them and for us … they even tested us for instance with implying than LGBT would be our new Evangiles and that opposing them was a blasphemy…our only path to a better future is clearly to revive Christianity and what was called our Natural Rights by Aristotle..if not we are doomed

Expand full comment

Dr. Been's analysis of the FDA arguments and letters from Blue Cross, etc., was very good. His remarks were fair and defensible. The only thing I would add to it was that in addition to the example of opioid warnings, the FDA attorney also referred to kids using Nyquil for basting chicken as another situation in which they discouraged its use. I would argue that the FDA's discouragement/warning against childrens use of Nyquil for basting chicken is not an adequate justificacation for the FDA's remarks against Ivermectin, because warning against using Nyquil to baste chicken is something that only children were doing, and children cannot always be depended upon to use good judgment, whereas trained doctors are, in fact, allowed to use drugs off label.

As to the letters from Blue Cross, etc., threatening doctors with Investigations, I think they are horrible, and they are incorrecting implying that their threats are justified in light of what the FDA has said on their website. I disagree greatly with that. The FDA statements do not support the threats in the Blue Cross letter. Obviously, someone has gotten to Blue Cross, and learned heavily upon them to make these threats based on the FDA's "recommendation."

The "justifications" by the Medical Boards and insurances such as Blue Cross are transparente. We know what they are doing. Honestly, I don't know what I would recommend in the Blue Cross insurance situation. They sound resolved to heavily retaliate. In the situation with Medical Boards, if you can get around the insurance situation, I would try a lawsuit along the lines of the Nass lawsuit. Stripping doctors of their Certifications and Medical License are acts that are directly responsible for the losses the doctors have experienced. Furthermore, I would argue that Medical Boards are comprised of Doctors who are well aware that Doctors are legally allowed to prescribe drugs for off-label usage, and that includes Ivermectin, that the FDA has approved for usag for other conditions.

Moreover, I would argue that the Boards have not ever [if true] objected to the use off label for any other FDA approved drug, and therefore, they are harassing and very harshly retaliating against, these doctors.

In addition the Medical Boards have the wherewithall to read and understand the limitations of any research that does not support the doctors' position.

Lastly, I would argue, furnish, and present, the volumes of research that have emerged since the Boards first contacted the doctors, and/or since the FDA put the "quip" and warning comments on their website, that clearly show the immense safety (as well as treatment success, and lives saved) of appropriate off label use, in both hospital and outpatient settings, for the treatment of Covid.

Expand full comment

American hypocrisy: Many of the same people who are “pro-life” when it comes to abortion, are in fact, pro-death with their Covid policy, both by commission—the jabs—and omission—Ivermectin.

Expand full comment

Get on Rumble!

Expand full comment

Until further notice, everything the government is involved in is a grift steeped in idiocy.

Expand full comment

Youtube is owned by the evil people at Google. They are hard core leftists who have only one belief - the ends justify the means", call them communists, socialists or fascists. Their goal in conjunction with other organizations like Facebook, the so-called Democratic Party, the WEF, etc., is total control over all people. They have no compunction about mass murder any more than their predecessors, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, etc. Their methods for the obliteration of most of humanity include viruses, deadly cures, aka "vaccines", designer wars like the Russian-Ukraine conflict that increases the cost of many products like wheat, fertilizer and various forms of energy, disruption of transportation channels, the isolation of people into self-contained cities where communications can be cut, roads blocked off making it easier to induce mass starvation. Their tools include banning cash and all media of exchange except centrally controlled digital currencies that can be used against dissenters by denying them any way to pay for needed products. The people involved in this are dedicated to what looks like depopulation of the planet to drastically reduce the number of humans by the billions. At one time this might have been far-fetched, but technology and control by despots have made it doable. For example, a rapid change from farming with nitrogen fertilizers to the far less efficient organic farming bankrupted the nation of Sri Lanka in a year. At least 3,000 farms in the Netherlands have been forced by its government to close. Netherlands is one of the world's top exporters of food products and much of its exporters goes to poorer countries, where the people will be forced to pay higher prices or will be unable to afford the imports leading to starvation and increased poverty. Ireland destroyed 200,000 cows to allegedly prevent a climate change catastrophe, a total scam. Climate does change, but no climate catastrophe prediction has ever happened. If the people of the world do not rise up and bring in new leaders who will organize and fight against these evil people, the future for most of the people in the world may become predictable - a much earlier death that normal. Time is running out.

Expand full comment

My feeling is that we should sue Faucci ,Ralph Baric and Eco Health alliance.They engineered the deaths of millions of people with malice aforethought.I think an interview with Dr David Martin would be good.

Faucci is up to his ears in the coverup of gain of function research.He lso knew that Hydroxychloroquin was effective against SARS COV 1 and against other coronaviruses .He published (as lead author) a paper to that effect in the Journal of Respiratory Medicine around 2012.

And Faucci was instrumental in warning that Hydroxychlroquin was dangerous to COVID patients and designing a trial where patients were given lethal doses of Hydroxychloroquin.

Faucci and Ralph Baric are a clear and present danger to the human species , guilty of mass homicide and crimes against humanity .

In discovery more of their evil doing and evil done by their partners in crime ,will come to light

Expand full comment

This is textbook takedown of the taker downers! Thank you FLCCC!

Expand full comment

Keep up the good work guys!

Expand full comment

For those that are still using Google/Chrome, **shame on you**

QUIT feeding the crocodile that is only planning to eat you later in the same day.

You CAN use Brave browser and its search engine, or engines Freespoke, Swisscows or Presearch.

And yes, we all get it. They ain't perfect either. But a darned sight better than fasco-Marxist Google

Expand full comment

One more suggestion, when it comes to finding a way to communicate doctors' messages on YouTube, I would try beginning by making just one or two videos I'm suggesting, as a test, that are "carefully worded." For example, you would not say the word "Ivermectin." You would word your message as "some treatment additions and/or alternatives," you would talk "every which way but sideways" about Ivermectin,

and then you would give information,

without reading off the title or using the "I word, that allows the listener to locate appropriate research articles. The people of You Tube may not want to read all those articles. Also, You Tube has to do a search, among the thousands of You Tube videos that come in, for Ivermectin articles. I'm guessing they also search for certain well-known doctors' names, and the names of organizations like FLCCC, to find the videos they don't like. If you were willing to use doctors and organizations whose names they may not be searching for, you might be successful in keeping these videos up on You Tube.

Expand full comment