I love these FLCCC updates. Always inspiring and informative!
My new motto is a variation on “Let Doctors be Doctors,” which Drs. Kory, Marik, Malone, Cole, and other great medical heroes of this era have long been shouting from the rooftops:
“Let Doctors be Doctors.
Let Patients be Partners.”
Corollary from St. Augustine (channeling through Dr. Robert Malone):
“The truth is like a lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself.” – Saint Augustine
FLCCC embodies both the motto and the corollary above.
The Twilight Zone use to be a show on black & white TVs…but now come to pass. They were oftentimes creepy shows, but none like this. I can hear the music now🎵🎶
Mathew Crawford is a statistician and runs a large math educational platform. He did an analysis of the Imperial County data which was also published also in the book "Overcoming the Covid Darkness: How Two doctors Successfully Treated 7,000 Patients."
I am posting this here because an MD wrote an article, sent it to the journal, and claimed that Paul Merick's paper on Vitiamin C should be withdrawn.
Mathew blew him out of the water. And Mathew's larger quest is to point out how badly statistics are used in medical articles. This is a technical article but as a math educator, it is very well written.
"The Meta-Analytical Fixers, Part III: Defamation of Paul Marik, Take Two"
Kyle Scheldrick wrote the attempted take down of Paul Marick's article. From his letter to the journal:
"Tuesday, 22 March 2022
Evidence of Fabricated Data in a Vitamin C trial by Paul E Marik et al in CHEST
Below is an email I have sent to Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, the editor of CHEST Journal, and prof Paul E Marik. As always an allegation against a multi-author paper is not an allegation against any individual author. "
"To:
The Editor in Chief of "CHEST" Peter J. Mazzone
cc: The Board of Norfolk Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
cc: The Compliance officer of Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
cc: Prof Paul E Marik
Dear Editor
Tonight on twitter a paper allegedly describing a 2017 study by a "Paul Marik" and team at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital describing a large survival benefit from Vitamin C was brought to my attention as a medical research finding that was not replicated in further studies and later reversed. The user stated that to their knowledge no evidence of fraud in the conduct of this study had been identified. The study is found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.036
Unfortunately within about 5 minutes of reading the study it became overwhelmingly clear that it is indeed research fraud and the data is fabricated."
Well, those first two paragraphs introduce his case.
**
To the rescue is Mathew Crawford
"Recall that Kyle Sheldrick is part of the Superfriends team, tickling each other en route to finding flaws in studies of early treatment efficacy despite the successful treatment of hundreds of thousands of patients by doctors such as Brian Tyson, George Fareed, Ben Marble, Didier Raoult, Pierre Kory, Heather Gessling, and so on, with a collective survival rate in the ballpark of 99.97%."
(the 99.7% is from Imperial County data)
a little later on
"Now, let's get to the part where Sheldrick displays total misunderstanding of statistics. Or is it disunderstanding? I'm still trying out "mistatistics" and "distatistics", though both sort of put me in a blood rage state with respect to the entire field of biopharmaceutical pseudostatistics that desperately needs to be dismantled and reconstituted." (there are a couple of words italicized in original)
I have never been comfortable with statistics. We have learned that random control trials have been rigged against ivermectin, HCQ and other drugs as part of the campaign to discredit early treatment. And the attacks keep coming.
Interesting that Mathew is challenging the use of statistics in biopharmacy. This may be a very important technical effort needed to move to more repurposed drugs.
Can anyone offer any insight into whether or not IVIG or immunoglobulin therapy can potentially be compromised because of the covid-19 vaccines and the subsequent spike proteins from donors? Is plasma affected by the spike?
I hope that you'll be good enough to dissect where this study went wrong, how it was designed to fail, etc... That the NEJM has REFUSED to publish studies which show the effectiveness of Ivermectin, in the past - at the very least, makes this look like Cherry-Picking...
Does this study somehow INVALIDATE the peer-reviewed work in this one?
Anyways I'm very thankful for you, and the work that you've been doing, to set the record straight on this topic, and so many others. Obviously - the clinical records of Doctors like yourself, Dr. Marik, Drs Fareed and Tyson, Dr Zelenko, Dr. McCullough, et al, appears to disprove the findings of this study.
A couple of points that I noticed, myself... There appears to be a huge cohort that were EXCLUDED from the study. WTF!?!? Also there was a small group given HCq, by itself. How did they fare? Why were no groups given a combination of the two, or one of the well established treatment protocols from FLCCC, Fareed and Tyson, Zelenko, etc., in their entirety?
Also, my understanding of Greek symbolic/scientific Code being poor... Is 400 mu grams per kilogram the appropriate dosage? Was it given too late? Did they give it to people on an empty stomach?
I would encourage you and your team to get cracking on your analysis - and then make a statement - to get out ahead of this story... Covid's 'Wrongest Man' - is already doing victory laps...
I love these FLCCC updates. Always inspiring and informative!
My new motto is a variation on “Let Doctors be Doctors,” which Drs. Kory, Marik, Malone, Cole, and other great medical heroes of this era have long been shouting from the rooftops:
“Let Doctors be Doctors.
Let Patients be Partners.”
Corollary from St. Augustine (channeling through Dr. Robert Malone):
“The truth is like a lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself.” – Saint Augustine
FLCCC embodies both the motto and the corollary above.
Imagine a world where medical professionals and scientists had a valid and respected voice in the medical field.
The Twilight Zone use to be a show on black & white TVs…but now come to pass. They were oftentimes creepy shows, but none like this. I can hear the music now🎵🎶
Mathew Crawford is a statistician and runs a large math educational platform. He did an analysis of the Imperial County data which was also published also in the book "Overcoming the Covid Darkness: How Two doctors Successfully Treated 7,000 Patients."
I am posting this here because an MD wrote an article, sent it to the journal, and claimed that Paul Merick's paper on Vitiamin C should be withdrawn.
Mathew blew him out of the water. And Mathew's larger quest is to point out how badly statistics are used in medical articles. This is a technical article but as a math educator, it is very well written.
"The Meta-Analytical Fixers, Part III: Defamation of Paul Marik, Take Two"
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-meta-analytical-fixers-part-iii-4e8?s=r
Kyle Scheldrick wrote the attempted take down of Paul Marick's article. From his letter to the journal:
"Tuesday, 22 March 2022
Evidence of Fabricated Data in a Vitamin C trial by Paul E Marik et al in CHEST
Below is an email I have sent to Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, the editor of CHEST Journal, and prof Paul E Marik. As always an allegation against a multi-author paper is not an allegation against any individual author. "
"To:
The Editor in Chief of "CHEST" Peter J. Mazzone
cc: The Board of Norfolk Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
cc: The Compliance officer of Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
cc: Prof Paul E Marik
Dear Editor
Tonight on twitter a paper allegedly describing a 2017 study by a "Paul Marik" and team at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital describing a large survival benefit from Vitamin C was brought to my attention as a medical research finding that was not replicated in further studies and later reversed. The user stated that to their knowledge no evidence of fraud in the conduct of this study had been identified. The study is found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.036
Unfortunately within about 5 minutes of reading the study it became overwhelmingly clear that it is indeed research fraud and the data is fabricated."
Well, those first two paragraphs introduce his case.
**
To the rescue is Mathew Crawford
"Recall that Kyle Sheldrick is part of the Superfriends team, tickling each other en route to finding flaws in studies of early treatment efficacy despite the successful treatment of hundreds of thousands of patients by doctors such as Brian Tyson, George Fareed, Ben Marble, Didier Raoult, Pierre Kory, Heather Gessling, and so on, with a collective survival rate in the ballpark of 99.97%."
(the 99.7% is from Imperial County data)
a little later on
"Now, let's get to the part where Sheldrick displays total misunderstanding of statistics. Or is it disunderstanding? I'm still trying out "mistatistics" and "distatistics", though both sort of put me in a blood rage state with respect to the entire field of biopharmaceutical pseudostatistics that desperately needs to be dismantled and reconstituted." (there are a couple of words italicized in original)
And he continues to zap him over and over
Here is the paper by Kyle
https://kylesheldrick.blogspot.com/2022/03/evidence-of-fabricated-data-in-vitamin.html?m=1
**
I have never been comfortable with statistics. We have learned that random control trials have been rigged against ivermectin, HCQ and other drugs as part of the campaign to discredit early treatment. And the attacks keep coming.
Interesting that Mathew is challenging the use of statistics in biopharmacy. This may be a very important technical effort needed to move to more repurposed drugs.
Congratulations Dr Marik
Can anyone offer any insight into whether or not IVIG or immunoglobulin therapy can potentially be compromised because of the covid-19 vaccines and the subsequent spike proteins from donors? Is plasma affected by the spike?
I'm sure that by now, you've seen this...
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869#full
I hope that you'll be good enough to dissect where this study went wrong, how it was designed to fail, etc... That the NEJM has REFUSED to publish studies which show the effectiveness of Ivermectin, in the past - at the very least, makes this look like Cherry-Picking...
Does this study somehow INVALIDATE the peer-reviewed work in this one?
https://www.cureus.com/articles/82162-ivermectin-prophylaxis-used-for-covid-19-a-citywide-prospective-observational-study-of-223128-subjects-using-propensity-score-matching
I can't imagine, how it could.
Anyways I'm very thankful for you, and the work that you've been doing, to set the record straight on this topic, and so many others. Obviously - the clinical records of Doctors like yourself, Dr. Marik, Drs Fareed and Tyson, Dr Zelenko, Dr. McCullough, et al, appears to disprove the findings of this study.
A couple of points that I noticed, myself... There appears to be a huge cohort that were EXCLUDED from the study. WTF!?!? Also there was a small group given HCq, by itself. How did they fare? Why were no groups given a combination of the two, or one of the well established treatment protocols from FLCCC, Fareed and Tyson, Zelenko, etc., in their entirety?
Also, my understanding of Greek symbolic/scientific Code being poor... Is 400 mu grams per kilogram the appropriate dosage? Was it given too late? Did they give it to people on an empty stomach?
I would encourage you and your team to get cracking on your analysis - and then make a statement - to get out ahead of this story... Covid's 'Wrongest Man' - is already doing victory laps...
I just wish all this information was in Spanish!