120 Comments

Wooooooooow! This is huge! Could this be considered medical bribery? Can charges be brought against him? Sooo many lives lost

Expand full comment

Yep, and this of course helped maintain the EUA for the COVID "vaccines". It does warrant an immediate investigation, hopefully someone will actually do this. Project Veritas maybe?

Expand full comment

So, not only useless loss of lives due to the inability to access an inexpensive drug which would have spared many, but the additional loss of lives, as well as serious side effects, due to vaccines which may not have been necessary had Iver been employed globally. No lockdowns. No job losses. No masks. No loneliness, endless fear, suicides, increase in drug addiction, and division amongst friends and family. Chaos was deliberately sown for 30 pieces of silver. Lives were altered, and continue to be altered. May God correct those who hate us.

Expand full comment

nothing much would come of an investigation. BUT ... if the BASIS for the EUA were to be proved, then the blanket immunity from liability would VANISH for all of the companies (still) selling the jabs.

Expand full comment

Sounds like a lawsuit is in order?

Expand full comment

UK fellow and university, so Project Veritas is out of range. Needs UK prosecution.

Expand full comment

That can still investigate though, couldn’t they? They’re investigative reporters, not prosecutors

Expand full comment

True, but I doubt they have the budget for overseas investigations. Plus, they would lack First Amendment protection outside the US, so Project Veritas techniques might be illegal in some other countries. Sad, but true.

Expand full comment

It actually goes much deeper than this.The efficacy of Ivermectin would have derailed the vaccines because there could be no authorization for emergency use and more importantly , it would have derailed the plandemic itself 'If there had been successful early treatment available from early on then the number of deaths would not have been constantly climbing , It would have been much more difficult for the fear porn to be effective andmuch harder to justify a need for the granting of emergency powers to governments around the world. Most of the destructive global pandemic response would have been completely unneccessary and much harder to try to justify,i.e., lockdowns, masks, social distancing, mandates and the arbitrary rules to control the populace by taking away so many freedoms. It could have derailed the entire plan eliminating most of the destruction that has happened.

Expand full comment

Totally agree, but in the end we see: it is all about power and money, big big money.

Expand full comment

Power, money and Depopulation!

Expand full comment

Unbelievable the lack of moral character of ANDREW OWEN and the OTHERS.

Expand full comment

All of this transpired in Jan 2021. I hope Dr. Owen is sleeping well at night, knowing that he is responsible for several hundred thousand deaths, and that's just in the US.

Expand full comment

Millions, dear, millions. Not even including the mysterious deaths from the clot shots.

Expand full comment

75 percent effective is actually about 95 percent plus effective. Why? Because that breaks the virus, it shatters the RO, the disease dies.

And that is not even considering Ivermectin in use with many other effective prophylactic treatments.

Expand full comment

I don't think Owens cares. If he did, he wouldn't have sold his integrity for filthy lucre. In his case, it was a LOT of filthy lucre. They say everyone has his price. I don't know if everyone does, but some certainly do. The millions given to his organization were pocket dust to the Pharm companies teeing themselves up to make billions.

Expand full comment

Wow! Good work! Now let's check the Metadata of all the other modified/slanted conclusions??

Expand full comment

Here is an email address for Dr. Owens

Aowen@liverpool.ac.uk

Maybe let him know what you’re thinking???

Expand full comment

Integrity cannot be purchased, only earned. Once it is lost, You can never reclaim……. I hope Owen and Hill never have a moment of peace….the enormity of their actions cannot be fathomed by me. Just IMO and thoughts.

Expand full comment

Wow that's some great detective work. Do we have means-motive-opportunity at this point?

Expand full comment

String ‘em up.

Expand full comment

The doctors I work with simply won't hear any of this. Dissent is intolerable to them. "We have to present a united front," I've heard so many times from them. The medical industry takeover is a fait accompli.

Expand full comment

I often hear that, too.

I tell them it’s not required that we see the crime the same. It’s mostly not even a science question but about opposing tyranny with whatever you have.

Expand full comment

I submitted my resignation today. I do not have another job lined up (yet). Just can't keep doing this.

Expand full comment

Diana,

Bless you, thank you, I wish you peace in your heart.

To those who might think “Mightn’t you have resigned earlier?” I say, it’s not for us to judge others journeys.

Good luck in whatever you do next.

Mike

Expand full comment

Except for those of us here 😉

Expand full comment

It's interesting to hear that, which is consistent with my experience. I haven't heard the phrase "...united front" from doctors in the U.S. (even though there is tremendous group think here as well), but I have heard it from my U.K. medical colleagues. I contacted a few of them around the time vaccine mandates were put in place, after it was clear to me that people in the U.S. were losing their minds. One British physician specifically stands out in my memory, one who had always impressed me with his sharp critique of medical literature and natural skepticism of medical guidelines and "position statements." I fully expected him to join me in questioning the new conventional wisdom regarding mask and vaccine mandates, lockdowns, etc. But he didn't. And he used the phrase "We need to present a united front..." which was the antithesis of his previous approach to medical inquiry and deference to authority. It seemed to me a bit like he was saying "we need to pick and choose our battles" but if this isn't a battle worth fighting for, what is? I'm still puzzled by that attitude.

Expand full comment

Two very senior public health professionals I used to work with turned into gubmint apparatchiks willing to toe any line, repeat any lie in order to keep their jobs.

Expand full comment

Wow! Askew Owen is guilty of fraud, Bribery, burglary (unless Andrew Hill allowed him to change the conclusions of the paper), violation of medical ethics and manslaughter of millions. He is a thief, a liar and a murderer. Arrest him without bail (or he will flee now that the jig is up) until he can stand trial for crimes against humanity.

Expand full comment

Public hanging

Expand full comment

It’s a shame parts of the story sit behind a paywall.

On principle, I don’t seek to make money out of COVID & on the same principle I don’t buy.

I say a shame because there’s no higher priority than to reach as many people as possible. Paywalls inevitable work against that objective.

Expand full comment

I'm of the same opinion (not that I could make money out covid if I wanted to).

Expand full comment

Dr. Yeadon, shame on you too for your diversion and belittling the only true detective and his uncovering That Professor Andrew Owen is the one who sold out millions to death and suffering. Where is your praise?

Expand full comment

Why shameful?

I don’t regard what we’re collectively doing as a commercial activity

If we don’t succeed, it’ll be the end of us all. If we succeed, time enough to graft for a living if needed.

Expand full comment

Shameful - you simply keep focus off the truth you know all about. There’s no virus. No doubt you sleep well as long as you see that money. Shame on you

Expand full comment

I'm a retired MD, so I have no stake in this other than what all of us being coerced and threatened by the gubmint have. Viruses are very real. All the internet Also, it is an overreach to claim to know what someone else 'knows' unless he has revealed his thinking to you.

Expand full comment

Shameful - you know the poison is inside of the mixture injected into people and that it’s effects vary due to composition, etc. and you know that there are no “new” events found because the harms are listed and all ready known and fill multiple pages seen in the revealed documents. So claiming that no new issues of concern being found - that’s because nothing is new

Expand full comment

It’s not a lie if you believe it defense

Expand full comment

100 percent correct.

Expand full comment

Excellent article. It's always great to see how the sausage is made when it comes to World "Health."

Expand full comment

I hate the fact that I now have to always wonder about the money/bribery behind healthcare/healthcare products. #neveragain

Expand full comment